mburkhardt@burkhardtlaw.com | (314) 518-1581

Burkhardt Law

By

But Chances Are So Small – Estate Planning – Burkhardt Law Firm

The number one reason I hear for why people they don’t think they need an estate plan is: “Well, my spouse is named as a co-owner on everything I own or is a beneficiary on everything I own and the chances of us dying at the same time is small.”  Well, even if you are right and you and your spouse don’t pass at the same time and your beneficiary designations avoid probate, there are reasons why you still need an estate plan.

Things can fall through the cracks, and you may forget to put a beneficiary designation on a new asset, or there may be other unforeseeable assets that don’t have a beneficiary designation and will therefore go through Probate.  A will is a good way in those circumstances to be able to tell the Probate court what to do with those assets.  A will can waive bond and ask for independent administration which can reduce the cost and time if assets have to go through Probate.

A good estate plan does not only plan for death, it is also a plan for when you are living but incapacitated.  An estate plan may include both a medical power of attorney/heath care directive and a financial power of attorney.  These documents are utilized while you are still alive.

If you have retirement accounts, your spouse cannot be an owner of your account.  They can be a beneficiary, but that beneficiary designation does not give them any rights to access your account or funds from the account until you have passed away. If you to need to access money from your retirement account and are not capable of making financial decisions the only way to do that is through a financial power of attorney.  A financial power of attorney will allow someone of your choosing to make financial decisions and access funds when you are not capable.  If you do no not have a financial power of attorney, there may be a delay and added cost if someone has to go through the court system for conservatorship in order to access the funds. This is just one of many reasons a financial power of attorney is an important document to make part of your estate plan.

The other document utilized as part of an estate plan during your life is the medical power of attorney/heath care directive.  If you are not capable of making medical decisions for yourself a medical power of attorney will allow a person of your choosing to make medical decisions on your behalf.  Do you have specific wishes for end of life? Would you want treatments like feeding tubes to be removed if the doctor did not believe you would have significant recovery?  It is important to make your wishes known and this can be done through a medical power of attorney/heath care directive.

Even if you are not concerned about assets passing through Probate, I strongly suggest considering an estate plan so that you can have access to funds when needed through a financial power of attorney and to make your end of life wishes known through a medical power of attorney/heath care directive.

By

Trust versus Beneficiary Designations

At least three times a week I am asked the difference between a will and a trust.  There are a few differences, but first I always like to point out that a will requires probate to be effective.  So, when planning for a client, I don’t often like to compare a will and trust, but rather a trust and beneficiary designations.

You can use both beneficiary designations and a trust to avoid probate, but the main reason a people choose a trust is control.  To me, control is the best reason to plan with a trust.  Legally, a trust is an entity that separates the control of assets from the use or benefit of those assets.

For families with minor children, I almost always recommend a trust.  Without a trust, even using beneficiary designations, you cannot avoid probate.  Minors cannot be in control of their own money, so a trust allows a legally responsible adult to make decisions over the assets for the benefit of the children.  It then sets up ages or life events when the children get the money.

Another common reason I recommend trusts are when there is real estate involved.  In Missouri, if a person has their name on real estate, their spouse also must sign off on any real estate transactions even if the spouse is not on the real estate.  So, if a person leaves real estate to someone through a beneficiary deed (the way to put beneficiaries on real estate), everyone on the deed plus their spouses will need to sign for the property when it is inherited.  Often, my clients would rather not involve the spouses or even have all beneficiaries make decision on the property.  Instead, they do a trust where one person makes decisions on the real estate and multiple people have the use or receive the proceeds.

One of the final reasons clients use a trust is to control how the money is paid out.  If a beneficiary is not responsible enough or has an addiction where the money would be harmful if the beneficiary had full access to the money.  In those situations, the trust can allow another person to use the money for the beneficiary or to give out money in regular installments like an allowance.

There are, of course, other reasons I consider trusts.  Family dynamics, contingencies, real estate.  However, when it comes down to it, the reason my clients choose a trust over a will or, more appropriately, beneficiary designations is it gives them control over how the money will be left.

 

By

Don’t Forget…. To Title Your Assets!

I meet with most of my estate planning clients three times and in each of those meetings I (try to) emphasize that an estate plan is truly controlled by how assets are titled. Of course the legal documents are important, I wouldn’t have a job if they weren’t. But the documents I create don’t mean anything unless we know how the assets are titled.

This is because it is really how an asset is titled that determines where the asset goes and if it will have to go through probate.

If there is a co-owner with a right of survivorship (this is generally called Joint Tenants with Right of Survivorship or JTWROS), then the property passes to the co-owner. This is also where trusts fall. In order for the trust to control, the title must be in the name of the trust and the trust must be the owner. The new owner under this ownership will have control and ownership completely outside of probate.

If there isn’t a trust as the owner or there isn’t a co-owner, then you look to see if there are beneficiaries. If there are beneficiaries, then they then own the property. And when I say beneficiaries, I also include Transfers on Death (TODs) and Payable on Death (PODs) designations. Again, these beneficiaries take ownership without probate.

It is only after ownership or beneficiaries that a will would control. If there are no co-owners and no beneficiaries, then whomever would get the property under the will is the new owner. However, a will must go through probate to transfer the property to the new owner.

And finally, if there are no co-owners, no beneficiaries, and no will, then intestate law controls and heirs get the asset. But again, the heirs would have to go through probate to gain access to the asset.

So, do me a favor, if you or a loved one has assets you’re worried about going through probate, CHECK HOW THEY’RE TITLED!

By

What Type of Estate Plan Do You Need? Choosing the Right Estate Plan

When I work with clients, I see so many different family types and not everyone has the same needs. There are some generalities that I use to guide what plans the different type of families need. For instance, I think most families with minor children need a trust. However, even then, not all clients fall into those generalities. That’s why it’s so important to evaluate each family’s need individually through a consultation. However, even at the end of the consultation, I think it’s extremely important for a client to understand and choose their own estate plan. Part of this is understanding the documents and how they work, which I’ve explained many times. But another large part of choosing the right estate plan is knowing the different considerations that go into the plan.

One of my first questions when sitting with a new client is always about their family and who we’re planning for. The more complicated a family is (i.e. step-children, half-siblings, etc) the more likely a trust or a more complicated plan will be needed to ensure things go where they are intended. Missouri law only provides for a very traditional family and even then isn’t often what clients would want. Thus, legal documents are needed to change these “default” laws and the more certainty a client needs of where assets will go, the more complicated the documents get. It’s also important to know if there is anyone who would potentially challenge a plan.

But the biggest question and concern for me is if there is a need for control. This normally applies because there are minor children who cannot legally handle money for themselves. However, if there’s a beneficiary who just makes bad financial decisions or has a substance abuse problem a trust might also be necessary. There’s also a limited ability to keep spouses or in-laws away from a plan if they could potentially cause problems through a divorce or other issues.

Finally, assets also are an important part of deciding a plan. If there are extremely limited resources, it’s hard to justify the expense of a more complicated plan, but it might also be worth it if any of the above are concerns. However, the type and location of assets also may make a trust worth it or not. For instance, with real estate anyone listed on a beneficiary deed plus their current spouse must sign on any sale of that real estate. That can cause major problems if there are multiple people involved and not all work together. The need for one person to make decisions on real estate may be enough to justify a trust. However, on the other hand, if most of the assets are liquid (retirement money, bank accounts, etc.) and it’s simply a matter of dividing money, then a trust might be overly complicated.

There are so many factors that go into what kind of plan fits a family. However, the more you know about the process and why a particular plan might be right, the better decision you can make for your loved ones.

By

Being a Parent: Planning for Children

When I first began my law firm, I started estate planning thinking of my brothers and sisters, nieces and nephews. Then when I had my first born almost three years ago, my perspective changed dramatically. Now as we prepare for our second child, I thought I would take a moment and reflect on how our estate plan has (and hasn’t changed) since children have come along.

The benefit of drafting your own legal documents is you can think ahead and prepare them for changes in the future. So, our documents from five years ago included provisions for future children. However, anytime a new addition is added to the family, the estate plan needs to be reconsidered.

This might mean a completely new structure. Going from a will to a trust. But it also means updating children’s names and very simple updates to make sure everyone is included.

It’s also an opportunity to make sure the people handling money and in charge of the children’s well-being are still appropriate. We had the trustee and guardian decided before Duncan arrived, but it’s amazing how the logically decision became so much harder once my son was actually here. In the end, I believe we made the right decision and we have not changed it. However, it’s mainly because I realize there is no right answer and no one can truly take our place if we aren’t here to parent. We can only choose and hope the transition would be as easy as possible.

Finally, it’s also a great time to review assets and make sure all assets will avoid probate and are included in your plan. If you’ve never talked to a financial advisor, it’s a great time to review life insurance as well as planning for the children’s future with 529s or other investments.

Now, I know many of my clients have children that are all grown up. However, those grownup children might have to start thinking about their own children. So, even if you’re not preparing for your own minor children anymore, it’s worth mentioning to your children for your grandchildren.

By

Save Heartache & Money

This week I gave a presentation to a group of professionals I work with on a regular basis. After the meeting, several came up to me concerned that their plans wouldn’t accomplish what they thought it would. So, in the hopes of saving your family heartache and money, I thought I would the main point of that presentation.

When clients hire me to do an estate plan, my job is to avoid probate in the most cost efficient manner with as little conflict as possible. There’s two situations where probate is possible. First, is when a person is no longer able to make decisions for themselves.

If incapacitated and a person does not have any documents in place, the probate court gets involved in a guardianship or conservatorship. In these cases, the court appoints someone to make financial and medical decisions for you. That person must get court approval for any purchases and must make annual reports. Generally, in a time when they must already take care of a loved one, the court is the last thing they need to be dealing with.

This is very easy to avoid through a power of attorney or a trust. Either document may control if you’re incapacitated, but there are two main differences. First, a power of attorney will only control what is in your individual name, while a trust will only control what is in the trusts name. Also, a power of attorney ends upon death, while a trust may also control what happens after you pass.

The other side of planning is what most people think of: when someone passes. Without a will, assets go through intestate law and must go through probate. Even with a will, assets go through probate.

As such, I normally recommend non-probate transfers to be used to avoid probate upon death. This is a fancy term for joint titling, beneficiaries, or a trust. There are different benefits to each one, but generally a trust is the “best” option, while beneficiaries are “better”, and a will is “good.”

A trust is the “best” option because it allows for control over the assets while avoiding probate. Trusts are also very adaptable, permitting one to only change the trust document instead of beneficiary designations when life changes (i.e. changing beneficiaries, beneficiary percentages, and any restrictions on assets). It also can set up different layers of contingencies for beneficiaries and often provides the least amount of conflict between family members. It’s great for complicated families or when minors are involved. I also recommend it when real estate is involved, because in Missouri, if a person or people own real estate their spouses must also sign off on any transaction involving real estate. So, for families with multiple children, it’s a good way to limit the amount of people involved in any decision regarding that property.

Beneficiaries are the “better” choice because they avoid probate. But I generally only recommend them, with liquid assets, limited family members, and responsible beneficiaries.

A will is the “good” option because it goes through probate. This is necessary for families who do not want intestate law to apply and for minor guardianship. But because it goes through probate, there will be court and attorney fees and I rarely recommend it by itself.

So, in the holiday spirit save heartache and money for your family by checking the beneficiaries on your assets with this checklist!

By

What Controls?

One of the most misunderstood topics of estate planning is what documents control a situation.  I often have people calling asking for a power of attorney, when they truly need to update how an asset is titled, or someone calls asking for a will when they really need to update a trust.  So, hopefully this month I can clarify what documents actually control a situation.  It all really depends on who legally owns the asset.

Titling always controls first.  If there are two people on the asset, then they have access to that asset.  Both signatures might be required, but often times (unless dealing with real estate or vehicles) one person may act without the other.

Often times, I have someone ask me about a power of attorney, but they actually mean another person is on their bank account or asset with them.  In that situation, the solution involves changing how the bank account is titled, not changing the power of attorney.

A power of attorney is when someone has an asset in their name, but a second person uses the document to access the first person’s asset.  The power of attorney may only be used when the person is still alive.  The most common time a power of attorney is used is when an individual is no longer able to make decisions and another needs access to his/her retirement accounts to provide for him/her.

However, if the asset is titled in the name of the trust (not in the name of the original owner), the trust controls.  If the original creator of the trust is not able to make decisions any longer the successor trustee takes over.  The successor trustee will have access to make decisions on the asset.  A power of attorney cannot apply in this situation because the person is not the owner the trust is.

When we start talking about when people pass, there are generally a few different ways for the property to be controlled.  First, again is who is titled on the asset.  If there is more than one name on the asset, the remaining name may be entitled to the asset alone.  It depends on exactly how the asset is titled. Generally, if the asset is owned by (and titled to) a married couple, the asset will automatically pass to the other.  If the owners are not married, it must state the asset is owned by joint tenants with right of survivorship for the asset to pass automatically to the other.

The title might again be in the name of the trust, and again, if that is the case, the trust document controls.  The successor trustee would take control of the assets and distribute or hold them as the trust document dictates.

If the asset does not have another person on the title as a current owner or is not in a trust, a beneficiary designation will control.  This might be a beneficiary deed on the house, a “TOD” or Transfer on Death on a vehicle, or a “POD” on a bank account, but if there is any form of a beneficiary listed, that beneficiary gets the asset.

It is only when there is no trust, other person, or beneficiary listed on the title that the asset would go through probate.  At that point, if there is a will the will would control, and if there is no will intestate law would apply.

While it can be confusing, the first step is always looking at the title.  A trustee will always control if it’s owned by a trust, a joint owner may be control, and only after that a power of attorney, beneficiary, or will.

By

Do You Need a Will?

Many times a potential client calls asking about a will and when we sit down for a consultation, they’re shocked to find out a will doesn’t accomplish what they want. Because this happens on such a regular basis, I thought I would go over what a will does and doesn’t do and when you might need a will or when you might need something more.

First, a will does not avoid probate. In order for a will to be effective, the court must verify the will and give all potential heirs an opportunity to contest the will. As such, assets passing through a will must go through court and may take months to years before they can be accessed. If your goals are to avoid court and hassle, then a will alone will not do this and you want to consider non-probate transfers.

But, maybe most importantly, if you have minor children you need a will. This is because a will is the only place to tell the court who you want to be guardians for your minor children.

However, even if you do not have minor children, I often recommend a will for a few different reasons. While the will may not be your main device to leave money to your beneficiaries, it is a very important back up. If you forget to put a beneficiary on an asset or put an asset in a trust, it will go through probate and a will can make that process easier a few different ways. First, if your beneficiaries differ from intestate law, if will ensure your assets go where you wish. Secondly, no matter whom your beneficiaries are, it can allow probate to proceed more quickly by allowing independent administration and waiving a bond. A will also allows you to choose who is in charge of handling your assets and acting for your beneficiaries as the personal representative or executor.

So while there are a few situations where you need a will, there are many more where you may not need one, but it would be beneficial.

By

Who Has the Power: Attorneys-in-Fact, Personal Representatives, Guardians, and Trustees

Estate planning can be complicated. In addition to different ways to structure a plan, multiple people can be involved. Most of the time, the people making decisions within the different documents are the same person. However, they don’t have to be. As such, it’s important to understand what the different positions and documents require.

Attorneys-in-Fact – This person can also be called an Agent, but it’s the person acting through a Power of Attorney. Their power either begins immediately or when a person is no longer able to make decisions for themselves. However, this power ends with the person creating the document (also known as the principal) dies. The attorney-in-fact can have many different responsibilities, but I generally divide it into two categories. The first being responsibility over the principal’s assets which remain in the principal’s name and legal decisions. The best example of this is generally making decisions over insurance policies or retirement accounts. They must use these assets for the principal’s benefits. The second category is medical decisions. The attorney-in-fact has the power of what treatments the principal should receive, may sign off on medical waivers, and will make the final decision on end of life treatment.

Personal Representative – Previously called an executor or executrix, this is the person acting under an individual’s will. When acting as a personal representative (or PR), that person will have to locate the will and deliver it to the probate court. They will then be responsible to the court to determine what assets must pass through probate with an inventory and accounting of those assets. The PR will have to determine what to do with assets, pay any creditor claims, and is responsible for all filings submitted to the court. At the end of the probate matter, the PR will also be the one who divides the estate to any beneficiaries.

Guardians – For many families, this is the most important role. This is specified in the will and is vital for determining who is responsible for minor or incompetent children. The court has the final decision on who a guardian will be, but a parent’s will and wishes are often respected.

Trustees – A trustee is the person responsible for enforcing the terms of the trust.   Essentially this means that when the principal is no longer able to make decisions (or chooses not to), the trustee will take control of any assets held in the trust’s name. At that point they will use the assets for the person who created the trust. When the principal passes, the trustee will be responsible for either distributing the remaining assets to the beneficiaries or managing the assets for the beneficiaries. This position can last for multiple years and generations.

All of these roles require a person to act in the best interests of the principal or the beneficiaries, but there can be very little oversight. A lot of responsibility and power comes with attorneys-in-fact, personal representatives, guardians, and trustees and there is definitely the ability to abuse the power. As such, it’s extremely important to choose the right person for each role and most importantly choose someone who can be trusted.

By

Planning for Minor Children

Starting in Spring I begin getting phone calls as parents plan vacations away from their minor kids. Understandable, parents want to make sure that if something happens to them while they’re on a trip, their kids will be protected. I’ve talked before about planning for minor children, but I thought it was time for a refresher.

I’ll quickly mention again there’s actually two sides to planning for minor children: the physical and the financial. For minors, the court requires a legal competent adult to be in charge of the welfare of the minor child. This is done through guardianship. The court will hold a proceeding to determine who this adult will be. The only way the court will consider the parents’ wishes is through a will. If there is no will, the court will determine on its own who should be in charge of your children. Probably a scary thought if you have differing values from some of your family (or at least it should be).

It can be hard choosing the person who would raise your children if you cannot, but I find this worksheet to be a helpful place to start.

The other side of planning for minor children is financial. If you place more than $10,000 of assets in a minor child’s name, Missouri requires the probate court to be involved. If you have a will, this might specify who is in charge of the assets, but it must still go through the probate court to be valid.

A lot of the clients I see try and avoid this through placing an adult’s name on the assets instead of the child’s. I hope needless to say, this is a very bad idea. First of all, that person then has no legal obligation to use that money for the benefit of the child. Even beyond this, the money is then at risk to any creditors or liabilities they have. But the largest drawback I see with this is that the assets are then subject to that adult’s estate plan (or lack thereof). If that adult becomes incapacitated and unable to access the money themselves, there is no way to legally use the assets for the child. Worse, if that adult passes without an estate plan taking this into account, the money most likely will not go to the child.

I also have some prospective clients who have a testamentary trust. This means the trust is established in their will not by a standalone trust document.  There are two major drawbacks with this type of trust. First, the will must go through the probate court in order for the trust to exist. Secondly, because the trust does not exist until after death it can be difficult to properly title assets to avoid probate.

The other hesitation for many parents is that this plan is only necessary if both parents pass. While this is true, you cannot unfortunately plan on the circumstances surrounding estate planning. It’s much easier to plan in advance than clean up the mess left behind. Planning is much less expensive done proactively and work does not need to be done twice if a plan is established beforehand.

This is why for most young families, even when I get asked about wills, I strongly recommend a trust in addition to the wills.

Burkhardt Law Firm

Phone: (314) 518-1581
Email: mburkhardt@burkhardtlaw.com
Address:
2333 Grissom Dr., Suite 107
St. Louis, MO 63146