mburkhardt@burkhardtlaw.com | (314) 518-1581

Burkhardt Law

By

Not Just One – Using One Beneficiary, Instead of Multiple

In the past month, I’ve talk to two different clients who have listed one person as a beneficiary on an asset when the asset is meant to go to multiple people or another person entirely.  If you have done this, please stop reading, and go change it right now!

Now the most common place I see this is for minor children.  Parents will put the person who is supposed to use the money for the child as the beneficiary on life insurance.  Now, I really dislike this for two major reasons.  First, that person is the legal owner of the money and does not have a legal obligation to use it for the child.  Well, if you trust that person enough with the money, hopefully that’s a non-issue.  But even if that’s not an issue, what happens if that person inherits the money then dies?  Chances are it will not go back to the children, but rather a spouse or that person’s children.  Just best to avoid by planning properly for minor children.

The other time I see people do this is for real estate.  They want to avoid a beneficiary deed where all the beneficiaries (and their spouses) must sign and make decisions together; instead they put one person on the beneficiary deed and tell them their wishes.  But the problem is that person has no legal obligation to share the money as instructed.  Further, while there may not be a tax consequence, there are likely extra tax returns that should be filed (which probably won’t be).  In the end, it causes a bigger mess than just creating a proper estate plan with a trust.

Finally, the biggest asset this is a problem with is traditional retirement money.  Instead of listing all the beneficiaries on an IRA, I had a client only list one sibling and ask them to share that money among all eight siblings.  Again, this person has no legal obligation to share, which makes me wary, but even more importantly there is likely to be a tax problem here.  Traditional retirement money has not had income tax taken out of it yet and so when the account is liquidated, income tax is paid at that time.  So, if a person inherits the retirement money, then liquidates it to divide it, that person will be paying a lump sum of taxes.  Instead, by listing all intended beneficiaries, each beneficiary will have the option to retain the retirement money as an inherited IRA, and only pay taxes in small amounts each year.  A much more tax efficient option.

So, if you have set up your plan listing one person instead of all the intended beneficiaries, you might want to reconsider your plan and even start thinking about a trust.

By

A New Year’s Resolution – Don’t Wait to Plan

A New Year’s Resolution – Don’t Wait

We have had the wonderful privilege of being extremely busy since I have returned from maternity leave.  I feel extremely lucky and blessed that my clients and those who refer me trust me enough that we had a great 2018 and are looking forward to a full and eventful 2019.  So, thank you to all who read this for your continued faith and trust in me.

However, I do have a bit of a request.  As we enter 2019, if you hear someone talking about a will or power of attorney, any estate plan, with the phrase “We’ve been meaning to do that…” or anything similar, please interrupt.  Now, estate planning is my business, so of course, it’s a bit self-serving.  But that really isn’t the reason.  I’ve had many acquaintances over the years who haven’t used me for one reason or another, and I understand when that happens.  A person can be too close.  But even when I’ve been told a potential client has had their plan done elsewhere, I thank them for getting it done.  Because it can be too late to plan.

I’ve helped a lot of families form a plan to avoid probate, but this year we’ve also helped many loved ones grieving sort through when a plan wasn’t in place.  And I’ll be honest, I prefer the planning in advance.  Many times, probate is simple, a few months, everyone getting along, and a magic court order that gives easy access.  I try to help it work this way any opportunity I can.  That, of course, isn’t all the time.  If there are people who need access to funds immediately, families that are more complicated, or just small assets spread everywhere, it can make probate a nightmare.  Unfortunately, I also have had to tell many families that with the amount of work (and legal fees) involved, probate just wouldn’t be worth it.

There’s also the call I get on a regular basis, where a loved one wants to help get a person a power of attorney, but there’s a question of capacity.  Sometimes, we’re able to proceed, but more often then not, it’s too late.  In that situation, the only way to access accounts would be to go to the court and petition for a conservatorship.

I hate those calls where I am the one breaking the news that court is the only way and often not a practical way because of the legal fees.  It’s terrible for me, and I’m not the one dealing with the situation.  So, do me a favor this year, and if you hear anyone making a resolution to get their estate plan encourage them not to wait!

By

Trust versus Beneficiary Designations

At least three times a week I am asked the difference between a will and a trust.  There are a few differences, but first I always like to point out that a will requires probate to be effective.  So, when planning for a client, I don’t often like to compare a will and trust, but rather a trust and beneficiary designations.

You can use both beneficiary designations and a trust to avoid probate, but the main reason a people choose a trust is control.  To me, control is the best reason to plan with a trust.  Legally, a trust is an entity that separates the control of assets from the use or benefit of those assets.

For families with minor children, I almost always recommend a trust.  Without a trust, even using beneficiary designations, you cannot avoid probate.  Minors cannot be in control of their own money, so a trust allows a legally responsible adult to make decisions over the assets for the benefit of the children.  It then sets up ages or life events when the children get the money.

Another common reason I recommend trusts are when there is real estate involved.  In Missouri, if a person has their name on real estate, their spouse also must sign off on any real estate transactions even if the spouse is not on the real estate.  So, if a person leaves real estate to someone through a beneficiary deed (the way to put beneficiaries on real estate), everyone on the deed plus their spouses will need to sign for the property when it is inherited.  Often, my clients would rather not involve the spouses or even have all beneficiaries make decision on the property.  Instead, they do a trust where one person makes decisions on the real estate and multiple people have the use or receive the proceeds.

One of the final reasons clients use a trust is to control how the money is paid out.  If a beneficiary is not responsible enough or has an addiction where the money would be harmful if the beneficiary had full access to the money.  In those situations, the trust can allow another person to use the money for the beneficiary or to give out money in regular installments like an allowance.

There are, of course, other reasons I consider trusts.  Family dynamics, contingencies, real estate.  However, when it comes down to it, the reason my clients choose a trust over a will or, more appropriately, beneficiary designations is it gives them control over how the money will be left.

 

By

Don’t Forget…. To Title Your Assets!

I meet with most of my estate planning clients three times and in each of those meetings I (try to) emphasize that an estate plan is truly controlled by how assets are titled. Of course the legal documents are important, I wouldn’t have a job if they weren’t. But the documents I create don’t mean anything unless we know how the assets are titled.

This is because it is really how an asset is titled that determines where the asset goes and if it will have to go through probate.

If there is a co-owner with a right of survivorship (this is generally called Joint Tenants with Right of Survivorship or JTWROS), then the property passes to the co-owner. This is also where trusts fall. In order for the trust to control, the title must be in the name of the trust and the trust must be the owner. The new owner under this ownership will have control and ownership completely outside of probate.

If there isn’t a trust as the owner or there isn’t a co-owner, then you look to see if there are beneficiaries. If there are beneficiaries, then they then own the property. And when I say beneficiaries, I also include Transfers on Death (TODs) and Payable on Death (PODs) designations. Again, these beneficiaries take ownership without probate.

It is only after ownership or beneficiaries that a will would control. If there are no co-owners and no beneficiaries, then whomever would get the property under the will is the new owner. However, a will must go through probate to transfer the property to the new owner.

And finally, if there are no co-owners, no beneficiaries, and no will, then intestate law controls and heirs get the asset. But again, the heirs would have to go through probate to gain access to the asset.

So, do me a favor, if you or a loved one has assets you’re worried about going through probate, CHECK HOW THEY’RE TITLED!

By

What Type of Estate Plan Do You Need? Choosing the Right Estate Plan

When I work with clients, I see so many different family types and not everyone has the same needs. There are some generalities that I use to guide what plans the different type of families need. For instance, I think most families with minor children need a trust. However, even then, not all clients fall into those generalities. That’s why it’s so important to evaluate each family’s need individually through a consultation. However, even at the end of the consultation, I think it’s extremely important for a client to understand and choose their own estate plan. Part of this is understanding the documents and how they work, which I’ve explained many times. But another large part of choosing the right estate plan is knowing the different considerations that go into the plan.

One of my first questions when sitting with a new client is always about their family and who we’re planning for. The more complicated a family is (i.e. step-children, half-siblings, etc) the more likely a trust or a more complicated plan will be needed to ensure things go where they are intended. Missouri law only provides for a very traditional family and even then isn’t often what clients would want. Thus, legal documents are needed to change these “default” laws and the more certainty a client needs of where assets will go, the more complicated the documents get. It’s also important to know if there is anyone who would potentially challenge a plan.

But the biggest question and concern for me is if there is a need for control. This normally applies because there are minor children who cannot legally handle money for themselves. However, if there’s a beneficiary who just makes bad financial decisions or has a substance abuse problem a trust might also be necessary. There’s also a limited ability to keep spouses or in-laws away from a plan if they could potentially cause problems through a divorce or other issues.

Finally, assets also are an important part of deciding a plan. If there are extremely limited resources, it’s hard to justify the expense of a more complicated plan, but it might also be worth it if any of the above are concerns. However, the type and location of assets also may make a trust worth it or not. For instance, with real estate anyone listed on a beneficiary deed plus their current spouse must sign on any sale of that real estate. That can cause major problems if there are multiple people involved and not all work together. The need for one person to make decisions on real estate may be enough to justify a trust. However, on the other hand, if most of the assets are liquid (retirement money, bank accounts, etc.) and it’s simply a matter of dividing money, then a trust might be overly complicated.

There are so many factors that go into what kind of plan fits a family. However, the more you know about the process and why a particular plan might be right, the better decision you can make for your loved ones.

By

Lineal Descendants Per Stirpes

There is a common legal phrase in the estate planning world: “Lineal Descendants Per Stirpes” or “LDPS.” And there’s a few reasons I am writing about it today. First, I use the phrase on a very regular basis, so it’s an important concept. But secondly, it has uses outside of just a legal document, like a will, and can help avoid probate if a person’s estate plan does not include a trust.

Lineal Descendants Per Stirpes allows an inheritance to automatically pass to a person’s descendants. This is extremely useful if there are multiple beneficiaries and their children should receive their share if they are not alive. Essentially, if a person is listed as a beneficiary and they pass, with the LDPS designation, their share automatically is divided to their descendants.

There are a few uses for the Lineal Descendants Per Stirpes designation. The first is within wills and trusts. Using LDPS allows for a long list of contingent beneficiaries without naming them all. Generally, I prefer using specifics, however, in the case of grandchildren or nieces and nephews who may not be born yet, the LDPS is a great way to provide for contingencies.

Even more importantly than within a will or trust, LDPS is a great way to provide for contingencies on a non-probate transfer (TODs, PODs, beneficiary designations, etc.). For example, a car uses the TOD designation, but does not allow for contingent beneficiaries. Using LDPS after the beneficiary would allow it to automatically transfer to that person’s children if the original beneficiary passes.

Lineal Descendants Per Stirpes is a mouthful and a fairly complicated legal tool, but it has significant uses in an estate plan. If you have questions on how to use LDPS in your plan, please feel free to give us a call.

By

Who Owns Your Property? Missouri Ownership

As I repeatedly tell my clients and have probably written many times in the past, titling is key to an estate plan. This specifically relates to ownership of an asset and who and how an owner is listed on that property. Recently, I had a client ask for a bit more information on what the different types of joint ownership are and she suggested I share that in my blog. So here you go.

In Missouri there are three types of joint ownership. The first is “Tenants in Common”. This is the default ownership for multiple owners unless you specific otherwise. This means that the owners each own their share as an individual. If one owner dies, their share passes as they designate. This could necessitate probate if proper planning has not occurred. This form of ownership also does not protect the owners from the creditor of any other owners. So if one owner owes money or is sued, that debt could be imposed upon the joint property.

“Joint Tenants with Right of Survivorship” or “JTWROS” is the second form of joint ownership. If property has this designation, it means the property will pass to the last surviving owner upon the other owner’s death. This is a great way to avoid probate if the surviving owner is meant to receive the entire property. However, this is not always the best solution. For example, if the children are listed as JTWROS, but the grandchildren should inherit their parent’s share if the parent passes before them, it may defeat the intent. This ownership also exposes the property to the each individual’s owner liability like Tenants in Common (where the property may be subject to the other owner’s debts).

Because of the liability risks Tenants in Common and JTWROS cause allowing one owner’s creditors access to the assets, I often consult against these forms of ownership.

However, the final form of ownership, “Tenancy by the Entirety” does not have this risk. In Missouri, Tenancy by the Entirety is the only form of ownership where the creditors of one owner may not access the joint property. This ownership can only be between a husband and wife. Further, the property has to be titled during the marriage. If the asset is titled in the owners’ name before the marriage, the property has to be retitled to obtain Tenancy by the Entirety.

While this might give you a guide to how your assets are titled, the best way to guarantee your assets are in a form of ownership that meets your needs is to consult with an attorney.

By

Ensure Your Estate Plan Avoids The Headache of Probate

Every year attorneys have the pleasure to updating their knowledge through continuing education. So this week it was my pleasure to sit through two days of extreme detail about probate court. I’m certain you are not reading this because you want to learn all about probate. However, what I want to communicate is that there was two days of material for an attorney (and there could have been more) demonstrating how complicated probate can be.

Even when it is not complicated, it is an administrative headache. An attorney is often required which is frequently the major expense of probate. But the expense is not the only problem. Probate also has many time constraints. Publication and notices are required unless the estate is under $15,000. Which introduces at least one month, if not over six months, of waiting. Opening a probate estate also creates an easy place for challenges and creditors. All great reasons to avoid probate.

Procedures and laws surrounding probate also affect how you plan to avoid probate. One of the laws mishandled frequently is that a spouse is entitled to at least 1/3 of the assets. This is extremely important in blended families when the spouses do not intend to leave all the assets to the spouse. In order to effectively do this a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement is necessary.

The other important provision regarding probate is that minors may not receive more than $15,000 without involving the probate court. Essentially, this means a trust is required to avoid probate when leaving money to minors.

If this sounds like something you want to avoid, then learn more about avoiding probate here.

By

Where There’s a Will, There’s a Way… (Sorta)

You know what a will is, right? Right.  Well, at least I’m guessing you do if you’re reading this.  It’s a legal document that says where your assets go when you pass.  But there’s a lot more to it than that. So let’s discuss all a will involves! Fun!

First, I want to address a very common misconception.  Wills go through probate. No discussion, it’s that simple in Missouri.

The next question really is if you need a will then right?  Short answer. Yes.

But of course being a lawyer, the better answer is that it depends.  Do you like Missouri’s intestate laws (where your property goes without a will)?  No, then ABSOLUTELY!   A will (and maybe a pre-nup) is the only effective way to tell the court where you want your assets to go.

Agree with intestate law? Then, you may not need one as much, but you probably still want one for the following reasons.

The most important being your wishes regarding minor children.  Do you have an opinion on whom your children should live with? Make decisions for them? Control their money?  Then you better have a will.  A will is the only document a court will look at for determining guardianship of YOUR kids.  (You can learn more about guardianship here).

A will can also dictate who is in charge of your property throughout the court process.  Don’t want your brother John to handle your assets, but rather your sister Susie? Better get a will and nominate a personal representative.

You’ve heard me say it once, and you’ll hear me say it again. Probate is expensive and time consuming. Having a will can cause the court process to be less expensive and move more quickly.  In a will you can authorize independent administration which allows your personal representative to handle more with your property without court oversight.  You can also allow this personal representative to serve without bond.  This means they don’t have the expense of finding and filing a bond (which can be impossible for those with bad credit).

Using a will in probate can also shorten the time it takes to go through the court by authorizing independent administration.  This allows the personal representative to act without court supervision over many common administrative actions.  In essence, it takes a lot of the burden of court off of the personal representative and might allow things to move more quickly because the personal representative does not need to go to court as often.

So when deciding if you need a will, much of the decision comes down to who your beneficiaries are, how your assets are titled, and how much of a problem a delay in court would cause. Not sure?  Give me a call.

By

Hey, That’s Not What I Wanted?!

Ever been to a restaurant where you ordered something, then when it was brought out, found out that what you ordered wasn’t what you thought it was?  That’s similar to how Missouri intestate law works.

Before explaining what the law says, let me define intestate.  Intestate just means without a will.  So, intestate law is what Missouri says happens to your stuff when you die if you don’t have a will or beneficiaries on assets.

Well that’s fine, but that just means it goes to my spouse who will use it to take care of my kids, right? Nope, and unfortunately, it’s not a simple answer.

Really, it all depends on the structure of your family.  Married? Kids? Kids from a prior relationship?  Here’s a quick chart I came up with to help:

Chart

The people who receive your assets under intestate law are called heirs (instead of devisee, beneficiary, or legatee if under a will or trust).

It’s important to note, that this only provides for biological or legal relationships.  Have a step-child who you consider your own? Not adopted? No heir.  Have a friend who you would like to include?  Too bad.  Have a significant other whom you didn’t marry? Out of luck.

So if this chart shows your assets going to a person or people going where you didn’t expect or don’t want… Well, it might be time to talk about a will.

Burkhardt Law Firm

Phone: (314) 518-1581
Email: mburkhardt@burkhardtlaw.com
Address:
2333 Grissom Dr., Suite 107
St. Louis, MO 63146