mburkhardt@burkhardtlaw.com | (314) 518-1581

Burkhardt Law

By

Celebrating Fathers

As I mentioned last month, the majority of my cases begin with a mother making a phone call. However, once we begin working together, I find many of the fathers focus on the practical aspects of protecting the money for the children. So as the thank you I promised in May, I thought I would thank all of those fathers by offering advice on one of the main concerns I see.

Often times, fathers focus on how long the money should remain in trust for the children. Most fathers (and mothers) do not expect their children to be ready for their inheritance immediately at 18. Instead what I normally suggest is to give the money out in stages. This can be life events or ages. For example, upon college graduation the children might receive 10%, then 50% at 30, then the remainder at 35.

When determining the times for distribution consider the following:

What life events do you want to encourage? School, careers, holy orders?

When do you think your children will be responsible enough to handle $10,000.00? $50,000.00? $100,000.00? $500,000.00?

How much of a burden do you want to place on the Trustee?

At what point is it the children’s issue if they want to make poor decisions?

At what point do the costs of administration outweigh the benefit of protecting the money?

There’s obviously no right answer when determining at what points to distribute money to the children. Holding the money in trust can be extremely beneficial if the children are not responsible. While the money is still in the trust’s name, the money is protected from spouses, creditors, and bad decisions. However, as I’m sure all fathers know, children cannot be protected forever. The costs and burdens of the trust as well as limiting the child’s access generally mean the money should be distributed at some point. And when? Well, thanks to the fathers who make that hard decision.

By

My First Mother’s Day as a Mother

As I was considering what to blog about this month, I was reflecting on the fact that this month I will celebrate my first Mother’s Day as a mother. It’s amazing to think my son is quickly approaching a year old and very surreal to even think of myself as a mother. But here I am and here he is.

Now, I realize that doesn’t seem to tie into estate planning, but it also made me consider another facet of my work. The majority of the prospective clients that call are women. And, more often than not, mothers. My husband is amazing and a wonderful father, as are most (if not all) of my clients who are also fathers. But I’ve found that it’s really the mother who takes action to plan for the kids if she isn’t there.

So this month, rather than explaining about guardianship or trusts or many of the other topics that come up for these mothers (and fathers), I just wanted to say thank you. Thank you to all of the mothers who have stopped and thought about the unpleasant aspects of life. Thank you to all of the mothers who have made hard decisions for their children. Thank you to all of the mothers who have taken the time and made estate planning and their children a priority.

And next month, I promise to thank all of the fathers.

By

Save Heartache & Money

This week I gave a presentation to a group of professionals I work with on a regular basis. After the meeting, several came up to me concerned that their plans wouldn’t accomplish what they thought it would. So, in the hopes of saving your family heartache and money, I thought I would the main point of that presentation.

When clients hire me to do an estate plan, my job is to avoid probate in the most cost efficient manner with as little conflict as possible. There’s two situations where probate is possible. First, is when a person is no longer able to make decisions for themselves.

If incapacitated and a person does not have any documents in place, the probate court gets involved in a guardianship or conservatorship. In these cases, the court appoints someone to make financial and medical decisions for you. That person must get court approval for any purchases and must make annual reports. Generally, in a time when they must already take care of a loved one, the court is the last thing they need to be dealing with.

This is very easy to avoid through a power of attorney or a trust. Either document may control if you’re incapacitated, but there are two main differences. First, a power of attorney will only control what is in your individual name, while a trust will only control what is in the trusts name. Also, a power of attorney ends upon death, while a trust may also control what happens after you pass.

The other side of planning is what most people think of: when someone passes. Without a will, assets go through intestate law and must go through probate. Even with a will, assets go through probate.

As such, I normally recommend non-probate transfers to be used to avoid probate upon death. This is a fancy term for joint titling, beneficiaries, or a trust. There are different benefits to each one, but generally a trust is the “best” option, while beneficiaries are “better”, and a will is “good.”

A trust is the “best” option because it allows for control over the assets while avoiding probate. Trusts are also very adaptable, permitting one to only change the trust document instead of beneficiary designations when life changes (i.e. changing beneficiaries, beneficiary percentages, and any restrictions on assets). It also can set up different layers of contingencies for beneficiaries and often provides the least amount of conflict between family members. It’s great for complicated families or when minors are involved. I also recommend it when real estate is involved, because in Missouri, if a person or people own real estate their spouses must also sign off on any transaction involving real estate. So, for families with multiple children, it’s a good way to limit the amount of people involved in any decision regarding that property.

Beneficiaries are the “better” choice because they avoid probate. But I generally only recommend them, with liquid assets, limited family members, and responsible beneficiaries.

A will is the “good” option because it goes through probate. This is necessary for families who do not want intestate law to apply and for minor guardianship. But because it goes through probate, there will be court and attorney fees and I rarely recommend it by itself.

So, in the holiday spirit save heartache and money for your family by checking the beneficiaries on your assets with this checklist!

By

What Controls?

One of the most misunderstood topics of estate planning is what documents control a situation.  I often have people calling asking for a power of attorney, when they truly need to update how an asset is titled, or someone calls asking for a will when they really need to update a trust.  So, hopefully this month I can clarify what documents actually control a situation.  It all really depends on who legally owns the asset.

Titling always controls first.  If there are two people on the asset, then they have access to that asset.  Both signatures might be required, but often times (unless dealing with real estate or vehicles) one person may act without the other.

Often times, I have someone ask me about a power of attorney, but they actually mean another person is on their bank account or asset with them.  In that situation, the solution involves changing how the bank account is titled, not changing the power of attorney.

A power of attorney is when someone has an asset in their name, but a second person uses the document to access the first person’s asset.  The power of attorney may only be used when the person is still alive.  The most common time a power of attorney is used is when an individual is no longer able to make decisions and another needs access to his/her retirement accounts to provide for him/her.

However, if the asset is titled in the name of the trust (not in the name of the original owner), the trust controls.  If the original creator of the trust is not able to make decisions any longer the successor trustee takes over.  The successor trustee will have access to make decisions on the asset.  A power of attorney cannot apply in this situation because the person is not the owner the trust is.

When we start talking about when people pass, there are generally a few different ways for the property to be controlled.  First, again is who is titled on the asset.  If there is more than one name on the asset, the remaining name may be entitled to the asset alone.  It depends on exactly how the asset is titled. Generally, if the asset is owned by (and titled to) a married couple, the asset will automatically pass to the other.  If the owners are not married, it must state the asset is owned by joint tenants with right of survivorship for the asset to pass automatically to the other.

The title might again be in the name of the trust, and again, if that is the case, the trust document controls.  The successor trustee would take control of the assets and distribute or hold them as the trust document dictates.

If the asset does not have another person on the title as a current owner or is not in a trust, a beneficiary designation will control.  This might be a beneficiary deed on the house, a “TOD” or Transfer on Death on a vehicle, or a “POD” on a bank account, but if there is any form of a beneficiary listed, that beneficiary gets the asset.

It is only when there is no trust, other person, or beneficiary listed on the title that the asset would go through probate.  At that point, if there is a will the will would control, and if there is no will intestate law would apply.

While it can be confusing, the first step is always looking at the title.  A trustee will always control if it’s owned by a trust, a joint owner may be control, and only after that a power of attorney, beneficiary, or will.

By

Do You Need a Will?

Many times a potential client calls asking about a will and when we sit down for a consultation, they’re shocked to find out a will doesn’t accomplish what they want. Because this happens on such a regular basis, I thought I would go over what a will does and doesn’t do and when you might need a will or when you might need something more.

First, a will does not avoid probate. In order for a will to be effective, the court must verify the will and give all potential heirs an opportunity to contest the will. As such, assets passing through a will must go through court and may take months to years before they can be accessed. If your goals are to avoid court and hassle, then a will alone will not do this and you want to consider non-probate transfers.

But, maybe most importantly, if you have minor children you need a will. This is because a will is the only place to tell the court who you want to be guardians for your minor children.

However, even if you do not have minor children, I often recommend a will for a few different reasons. While the will may not be your main device to leave money to your beneficiaries, it is a very important back up. If you forget to put a beneficiary on an asset or put an asset in a trust, it will go through probate and a will can make that process easier a few different ways. First, if your beneficiaries differ from intestate law, if will ensure your assets go where you wish. Secondly, no matter whom your beneficiaries are, it can allow probate to proceed more quickly by allowing independent administration and waiving a bond. A will also allows you to choose who is in charge of handling your assets and acting for your beneficiaries as the personal representative or executor.

So while there are a few situations where you need a will, there are many more where you may not need one, but it would be beneficial.

By

A New Perspective to Estate Planning – Parenthood

My husband and I just welcomed our first child into the world on June 16th. As I was thinking of what to discuss this month, I thought I’d simply share how my new parenthood has made me reconsider our estate plan and the documents I create for my clients on a regular basis.

The first thing that occurred to me is how important a medical power of attorney really is. This was my first experience being hospitalized; while I did not have to use my power of attorney, it was extremely comforting to me to know my husband would be able to make medical decisions if I was unable.

It also made me re-evaluate our trust and trustees. We completed our trust years ago and with the birth of our first born, my husband and I have set aside some time to review our trust and make sure the decisions we made then still are applicable to our new family.

But the most important thing I have realized is how hard it is to choose a guardian. I have always helped my clients sort through the options and generally act as a third party perspective with objective reasons why someone may or may not be a good fit. Well, I now understand on a very personal level why it is so hard. It’s so difficult to find someone who will raise your child the way you want to raise him. Everyone we’ve considered has positive and negative characteristics and it’s so easy to rule someone out because they’re not perfect. As I’ve told my clients in the past, no one can replace them, they’re only able to choose the best option in the worst circumstance.

Parenthood has given me a new perspective and while I’m proud of that third party, objective view, I hope it’s given me an opportunity to better understand the families I work with and the difficult decisions they must face when forming an estate plan.

By

Planning for Minor Children

Starting in Spring I begin getting phone calls as parents plan vacations away from their minor kids. Understandable, parents want to make sure that if something happens to them while they’re on a trip, their kids will be protected. I’ve talked before about planning for minor children, but I thought it was time for a refresher.

I’ll quickly mention again there’s actually two sides to planning for minor children: the physical and the financial. For minors, the court requires a legal competent adult to be in charge of the welfare of the minor child. This is done through guardianship. The court will hold a proceeding to determine who this adult will be. The only way the court will consider the parents’ wishes is through a will. If there is no will, the court will determine on its own who should be in charge of your children. Probably a scary thought if you have differing values from some of your family (or at least it should be).

It can be hard choosing the person who would raise your children if you cannot, but I find this worksheet to be a helpful place to start.

The other side of planning for minor children is financial. If you place more than $10,000 of assets in a minor child’s name, Missouri requires the probate court to be involved. If you have a will, this might specify who is in charge of the assets, but it must still go through the probate court to be valid.

A lot of the clients I see try and avoid this through placing an adult’s name on the assets instead of the child’s. I hope needless to say, this is a very bad idea. First of all, that person then has no legal obligation to use that money for the benefit of the child. Even beyond this, the money is then at risk to any creditors or liabilities they have. But the largest drawback I see with this is that the assets are then subject to that adult’s estate plan (or lack thereof). If that adult becomes incapacitated and unable to access the money themselves, there is no way to legally use the assets for the child. Worse, if that adult passes without an estate plan taking this into account, the money most likely will not go to the child.

I also have some prospective clients who have a testamentary trust. This means the trust is established in their will not by a standalone trust document.  There are two major drawbacks with this type of trust. First, the will must go through the probate court in order for the trust to exist. Secondly, because the trust does not exist until after death it can be difficult to properly title assets to avoid probate.

The other hesitation for many parents is that this plan is only necessary if both parents pass. While this is true, you cannot unfortunately plan on the circumstances surrounding estate planning. It’s much easier to plan in advance than clean up the mess left behind. Planning is much less expensive done proactively and work does not need to be done twice if a plan is established beforehand.

This is why for most young families, even when I get asked about wills, I strongly recommend a trust in addition to the wills.

By

Will You Have Access to Your Children’s Medical Information?

You’ve probably considered your own plans, perhaps even your parents. But have you thought about your children’s plans? You might think they’re young enough they don’t need a plan, but for your benefit, here’s why they might.

First, in the situation of older adult children you might be hoping to leave them an inheritance. Depending on how they receive that inheritance, their own estate plan might come into effect. Because of that, if you have a strong opinion on where you’d like the money to go, you first might to reconsider your own plan, but also ask your kids what their plan looks like.

Second, in the situation of younger adult children (18+) you are no longer their legal guardian. Which means you no longer have legal rights to their medical or financial information. This is a scary thought for most parents with children in college. If there’s a medical emergency you may not have access to your child’s medical information.

Finally, with younger children, legal guardians have the right to make decisions for their children, but what happens if all of the legal guardians are out of town and inaccessible? Before leaving town, you might consider putting in place a power of attorney to allow someone else to make important and time sensitive medical considerations for your kids.

So when considering your own plans, don’t forget to think about your children’s decisions as well!

By

You Get Nothing… For Now: Ways to Plan with a Trust

The main reason my clients use trusts are to allow the beneficiary or beneficiaries to receive the use of the assets, but have someone else make the financial decisions. This may because they are minors or there are other circumstances why the beneficiary should not have access to money. The situation directly relates to how the trust document is written, whether the assets remain in trust forever or if they are given to the beneficiary upon some specific event.

If you have or are considering a trust I would consider the following things to determine when to give the beneficiary control of the assets:

  • Why is a trust necessary?
  • Is there ever a time or event that would ensure the beneficiary is responsible enough for the assets?
  • Do I care if the assets are used in a manner I would not approve?
  • Am I concerned about a spouse or future spouse potentially being involved with the assets?
  • Are there events in the beneficiary’s life that should be encouraged through a gift?
  • Are there events in the beneficiary’s life that I want to celebrate with a gift?

As I’ve been drafting trusts I’ve come across many different times when a client wants to give the beneficiary control of the assets. These are a few of my favorites and the most common:

  • Graduation from school
  • Marriage or Holy Orders
  • Specific ages (25, 30, etc.)
  • No drug use for 5 years
  • No felonies
  • Employment

These are just a few of the clauses I’ve drafted and come across, but the list really is unlimited. What controls would you put in a trust for your beneficiaries?  Share at www.facebook.com/burkhardtlaw

By

Who Do You Trust? Choosing a Trustee

Happy Labor Day! What better to talk about on a day dedicated to the contributions of workers that have made this county great than the work that a trustee must do? If at this point you don’t know the difference between a will and a trust you should read July’s blog post.

Before going too in depth, I have to mention, a trust can be written in so many different ways that there’s no guaranteeing trustees will always have the same powers or the trust will always have the same provisions. As I write this, please realize a trust can come in several forms and I am only speaking in generalities.

Normally a trust is set up where the person creating the trust, the settlor or grantor, is also the trustee. While the settlor is alive and competent, they can continue using their assets like they normally would. It’s only when they can no longer make decisions or pass that they would stop controlling their assets.

This is when a successor trustee (named by the settlor) would take over. This means a successor trustee may control the trust assets at two different points and for the benefit of different people. The first time is when the settlor is still alive and the trustee must use the trust assets for the benefit of the settlor. This probably will include paying for medical bills, housing, and living expenses. It also will be the trustee’s responsibility to manage any current assets, including maintaining insurance on the belongings and keeping any property in good condition. Essentially, the trustee is the one responsible for making financial and legal (not necessarily medical) decisions for the settlor.

The other situation where the successor trustee takes over is when the settlor has passed. At this point, the terms of the trust cannot change. The trustee CANNOT change beneficiaries or change what the settlor has decided will happen. If the assets are to be distributed, the trustee may chose when to distribute assets and what to do with the possessions until then (again maintaining insurance, giving permission to use assets, etc).

The bigger responsibility is when the assets will be held in trust for a longer period. This is especially the case with minors. In this situation the trustee must decide how to spend the assets for the beneficiaries. They will have the discretion to use the money for college, food, housing, or even to withhold it. In this scenario, the trustee takes the place of the settlor in deciding how the money will be used. As such, it’s an extremely important decisions and must be placed with someone who the settlor trusts and who the settlor thinks will use the money in a way he or she would approve.

No matter why, when, or the time period, a trustee is ultimately in a position to control assets and make multiple administrative and financial decisions. Thus, when choosing a trustee, it’s extremely important to consider the prospect’s responsibility level, risk management abilities, financial abilities, and compare priorities.

Burkhardt Law Firm

Phone: (314) 518-1581
Email: mburkhardt@burkhardtlaw.com
Address:
2333 Grissom Dr., Suite 107
St. Louis, MO 63146